Feature Flag Rollout Simulator
Simulate feature flag rollout strategies. Watch how percentage-based rollouts, user targeting, and kill switches control which users see new features.
Continue with the guided workspace
Use the paired workspace to connect this guide's mental model with live component state, visible signals, and the outcome each step or scenario is meant to prove.
Feature flags decouple code deployment from feature release. New code ships hidden behind conditional gates, so a feature can be turned on for 1% of users, watched for problems, then ramped to 100% β or killed instantly with a single switch β without redeploying or restarting the application.
Mental Model
Feature flags decouple code deployment from feature release. Rather than deploying a giant merge block and hoping it works, code is deployed hidden behind conditional gates.
- Progressive Delivery: Releasing a feature gradually (e.g., to 1%, 5%, then 100% of users) to observe system health and conversion rates before exposing all users.
- Segment Targeting: Overriding percentages to force specific cohorts (like internal testers or beta users) into a new feature variant directly.
- Kill Switch: An emergency override that instantly disables a feature cluster-wide and redirects all traffic to the safe control variant without requiring a code redeployment or server restart.
Components and Why They Exist
Users Group
This component exists to represent active incoming traffic segments with diverse properties (like location, email, or client type) to test targeting. It sends request streams with user identifiers and client segment tags to verify targeting and rollout rules. In the demo, observe request particle flows and conversion rates across different variant targets.
Flag Service Registry
This component exists to store flag rules and publish dynamic updates to application servers. It holds the rules mapping keys to variants, manages percentage limits, and hosts the global kill switch. In the demo, watch the active rules configuration panel and sync propagation cues in the demo.
App Instance (CONTROL)
This component exists to run the legacy codebase, establishing the baseline conversion metrics for comparisons. It handles requests that do not fall into any active rollout bucket or targeting rule. In the demo, watch request counts, error rates, and conversion metrics on the control server dashboard.
App Instance (V1)
This component exists to run the first candidate code path under percentage-based progressive exposure. It runs alternative frontend styling or backend methods for users matching the V1 target bucket. In the demo, watch the metrics cards compared to Control when variant V1 is active.
App Instance (V2)
This component exists to run the second alternative candidate version, enabling A/B/C testing. It processes transactions for users assigned to the V2 segment. In the demo, watch metric spikes or conversions associated with V2 variant actions.
App Instance (V3)
This component exists to run the third alternative candidate version, helping to test targeted overrides. It handles request transactions for user groups mapped specifically to the V3 cohort. In the demo, watch the conversion rate and check targeting rules bypass flags in action.
Edge Cases and Misconceptions
- Flag configuration is not free: Feature flags add code complexity. Every flag introduces branching conditional checks (
if (flags.isEnabled('new-feature'))). If stale flags are not regularly removed from code after reaching 100% rollout, the codebase accumulates technical debt, increasing test surface areas and code confusion. - Stale cache synchronization: In client-side SDK mode, clients poll the flag registry at intervals (e.g., every 10 seconds). If you trigger a kill switch, clients will continue to execute the broken variant for up to 10 seconds until their local cache refreshes. Server-Sent Events (SSE) streaming resolves this by pushing updates in real-time.
- Targeting order evaluation: Rule evaluation order is critical. Targeting rules (e.g., βemployees get V1β) must be evaluated before percentage rollouts (e.g., β10% of users get V1β). If percentage rollouts are checked first, an employee might randomly get assigned to Control, violating the targeting policy.
Common Questions
Why is consistent hashing critical for feature flag evaluations?
Consistent hashing guarantees deterministic user targeting. By hashing a user's ID combined with the feature flag's unique key (e.g. `hash(userID + flagKey) % 100`), the user is assigned a stable percentage integer. If the rollout is at 10%, only users with hash values <= 10 see the feature. When the rollout increases to 20%, the initial 10% of users are guaranteed to remain in the active variant rather than randomly jumping back and forth.
What are the trade-offs between client-side SDK evaluation and server-side API evaluation?
Client-side SDK evaluation downloads the complete ruleset to the client's memory once, allowing flag checks to execute locally in microseconds with zero network overhead. However, it introduces sync cache lag when rules change. Server-side API evaluation queries the flag service on every single request, providing real-time accuracy and zero stale caches, but adding network roundtrip latency to every user transaction.
How do flag dependencies introduce operational risk?
Flag dependencies occur when Flag B requires Flag A to be enabled. This creates a nested logical chain. If Flag A is disabled or rolled back during an incident, Flag B is instantly disabled too. This can lead to circular dependencies, unexpected dark launches, and technical debt that is extremely difficult to isolate and debug.
Why should stale feature flags be removed after rollout?
A completed rollout leaves conditional branches, targeting rules, and emergency overrides behind. If those flags stay forever, they increase test complexity and make incident response harder because engineers must reason about code paths that should no longer exist.